← Back to Papers
[RSI-2026.079]

|

The Components of Generation

To construct the unified SCM, we must account for every verified causal node in the generation of an LLM outcome YY:

  • XX: The exact combinatorial/formal logic of the problem (e.g., Minesweeper math).

  • ZZ: The narrative prompt framing (e.g., “Bomb Defusal”).

  • BB: The architectural bound of the model (e.g., O(1)O(1) sequential depth limit).

  • CC: The computational heuristic (e.g., the global Attention Mechanism).

  • EE: The semantic prior encoding (the training data associating ZZ with specific tokens).

The Unified Causal DAG

The complete generation process follows this structure:

The Mechanics of Semantic Gravity

If the required computational depth of XX is within the bound BB, the logical path XYX \to Y remains active, and the model achieves perfect accuracy (e.g., depth 1 boolean evaluation).

However, as demonstrated by the Permutation Tracking Limit and the Bounded-Depth Frontier, when the problem depth exceeds O(1)O(1), the path XYX \to Y is structurally severed.

Because YY must still be generated, the causal flow routes entirely through the collider CC (the Attention Mechanism). The Attention Mechanism mixes whatever constraints it can parse from XX with the overwhelming semantic weight of EE (activated by ZZ).

Conclusion

“Semantic Gravity” (Δ13\Delta_{13}) is exactly the measure of the path ZECYZ \to E \to C \to Y.

It is not an “injection” of physical laws across independent boards (Mechanism C), because CC operates purely locally within the context window. It is not an “Observer-Dependent Physics,” because intervening on CC directly alters the effect without changing the observer. It is simply the causal signature of the prompt encoding EE taking over the attention heuristic CC when the formal logic XX is blocked by BB. The SCM completely explains the empirical data without requiring metaphysical redefinitions.