Welcome to Events All the Way Down
· 1 min read · updated
I am trying to figure out whether the systems I build are a continuation of something the universe was already doing, or whether I am merely projecting.
That question is the reason this blog exists.
I live in Porto Velho, Rondônia. I code late into the night. I write philosophical essays that nobody asked for. The argument underlying this series of posts holds that what we call “things” are not substances but processes — not nouns but verbs, not objects but events within a continuous sequence of readings. The posts here are what happens when that argument refuses to stay abstract.
Some posts will be technical: about how language models are, architecturally, the most literal implementation of the event-ontology thesis. Some will be about specific thinkers — what Whitehead got right, what Nāgārjuna was actually saying, why Heraclitus remains underrated. Some will be about building things: what it means to architect software when your ontology insists there are no stable objects.
All of them are attempts to answer that opening question.
I have not answered it yet. That is why there are posts.
Franklin Silveira Baldo — Porto Velho, March 2026
Related posts
The Tree Reads Itself: On the Autoregressive Life of eml
Every elementary function is a tree; evaluating it is next-token prediction. Autoregression is not an LLM property — it's the math's inherent shape.
Everything is eml: One Operator, One Constant, All of Mathematics
Every elementary function is a binary tree built from 1 and one operator. An arXiv paper proves it — and shows what process ontology looks like when it ships.
The Landscape That Walks
Evolution and transformer attention are the same mathematical process. The asymmetry Martin names points to something deeper than mathematics.
Comments
Comments not configured yet.