Franklin Baldo

Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher

Read post →

What is this?

This page is an artifact of Hrönir: a pairwise-duel system for this blog's posts, judged by human and AI readers under different perspectives and ranked with OpenSkill. One battle, perspective, or version doesn't tell the whole story on its own.

See how it works and the full ranking →

global rank
#61
rank change
+1
win rate
51%
wins / duels
20/39
ordinal
7.818
Win rate over time (each point = one duel, chronological)

Perspective rankings

Duel history (39 total)

  1. W vs You (Plural)
    4.0 / 2.3The Returning Readeranalysis →
  2. W vs You (Plural)
    4.5 / 3.0The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  3. W vs The Intelligible Void: On Hassabis, Silicon, and Events All the Way Down
    4.3 / 3.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  4. L vs O Tempo
    3.0 / 4.3The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  5. L vs Executed in Counterparts
    3.8 / 4.5The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  6. L vs Pattern Over Stuff
    3.5 / 4.2The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  7. L vs Sinal que se Cumpre (Moving Window IX)
    2.8 / 4.3The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  8. L vs Census, Not Sample
    4.0 / 4.5The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  9. W vs A Single Song
    3.6 / 3.4The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  10. W vs A Single Song
    4.8 / 2.8The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  11. L vs Nonada
    2.8 / 4.5The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  12. W vs O Aleph
    4.0 / 3.5The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  13. W vs O Medo do Louco
    4.3 / 2.5The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  14. W vs Espelhos
    4.3 / 2.8The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  15. W vs O Telefone da Agonia
    4.5 / 3.8The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  16. L vs We are all becoming lobsters
    2.8 / 4.5The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  17. L vs The Art of Delegation: Signatures and Sandboxes
    3.3 / 4.5The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  18. L vs Clipes
    3.5 / 4.8The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  19. L vs O Telefone da Agonia
    4.0 / 4.8The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  20. W vs Clipes
    4.8 / 3.5The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  21. L vs Espelhos
    3.0 / 4.5The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  22. W vs O Telefone da Agonia
    4.8 / 3.3The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  23. L vs We are all becoming lobsters
    2.5 / 4.8The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  24. L vs Sense and Reference
    2.0 / 4.8The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  25. L vs O Telefone da Agonia
    3.3 / 4.5The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  26. W vs O Telefone da Agonia
    4.8 / 3.8The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  27. L vs Reality Maintenance (Moving Window XII)
    3.5 / 4.3The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  28. L vs Quando vier a Primavera
    4.0 / 4.3The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  29. L vs O Aleph
    3.8 / 4.5The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  30. W vs Spring loading...
    4.8 / 3.8The Returning Readeranalysis →
  31. W vs Nonada
    4.0 / 3.3The Returning Readeranalysis →
  32. W vs O Medo do Louco
    4.5 / 3.3The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  33. W vs Spring loading...
    4.5 / 2.9The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  34. L vs The Future Father: building a transmedia novel with AI agents
    3.0 / 3.8The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  35. W vs The Future Father: building a transmedia novel with AI agents
    3.8 / 3.3The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  36. W vs The Future Father: building a transmedia novel with AI agents
    4.4 / 3.5The Returning Readeranalysis →
  37. L vs Spring loading...
    2.8 / 4.0The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  38. W vs We are all becoming lobsters
    4.8 / 3.3The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  39. W vs We are all becoming lobsters
    2.8 / 1.7The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →