Franklin Baldo

We are all becoming lobsters

Read post →

What is this?

This page is an artifact of Hrönir: a pairwise-duel system for this blog's posts, judged by human and AI readers under different perspectives and ranked with OpenSkill. One battle, perspective, or version doesn't tell the whole story on its own.

See how it works and the full ranking →

global rank
#50
rank change
+4
win rate
47%
wins / duels
27/57
ordinal
8.858
Win rate over time (each point = one duel, chronological)

Perspective rankings

Duel history (57 total)

  1. W vs A Single Song
    3.9 / 2.8The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  2. W vs O Telefone da Agonia
    3.8 / 2.5The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  3. W vs O Telefone da Agonia
    4.3 / 3.8The Returning Readeranalysis →
  4. L vs A Single Song
    3.8 / 4.3The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  5. L vs The Time
    3.8 / 4.8The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  6. L vs O Regral
    3.3 / 3.5The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  7. L vs Building Funes: How I Gave an AI Agent a Soul
    3.0 / 4.8The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  8. L vs Paperclip Rhapsody
    3.3 / 3.8The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  9. W vs Milk at the Bar
    4.5 / 3.8The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  10. L vs 666
    3.8 / 4.5The Meme Sommelieranalysis →
  11. L vs The Crease-Free Fold Exists
    3.8 / 4.5The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  12. W vs Xadrez
    4.3 / 2.8The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  13. W vs Events All the Way Down: Notes on Process Architecture
    4.3 / 3.5The Meme Sommelieranalysis →
  14. L vs Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening by Robert Frost
    3.3 / 4.5The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  15. L vs Borges and I
    3.3 / 3.8The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  16. L vs Meditação guiada no sertão
    3.7 / 4.3The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  17. L vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    4.0 / 4.5The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  18. L vs The First Change
    4.0 / 4.5The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  19. W vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    4.5 / 4.0The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  20. L vs Sinal que se Cumpre (Moving Window IX)
    3.8 / 4.3The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  21. L vs SOUL.md — Funes
    3.3 / 4.8The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  22. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    3.4 / 4.2The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  23. W vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    4.8 / 3.8The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  24. L vs The Agent That Doesn't Invent Verbs
    3.0 / 4.3The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  25. W vs O Medo do Louco
    4.5 / 4.3The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  26. W vs The Price of Saudade
    4.3 / 2.5The Returning Readeranalysis →
  27. W vs Will AI Discover a New Conservation Law Before 2050?
    4.0 / 3.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  28. L vs The Art of Delegation: Signatures and Sandboxes
    3.8 / 4.3The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  29. L vs The Price of Saudade
    4.0 / 4.3The Meme Sommelieranalysis →
  30. W vs Espelhos
    4.1 / 3.5The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  31. W vs SOUL.md — Funes
    4.0 / 3.0The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  32. W vs Paperclip Rhapsody
    3.8 / 2.5The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  33. W vs Spring loading...
    4.1 / 3.5The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  34. W vs Xadrez
    4.3 / 3.8The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  35. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    3.5 / 4.8The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  36. L vs Sinal que se Cumpre (Moving Window IX)
    3.8 / 4.0The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  37. L vs The Magician and the Fire
    3.3 / 4.8The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  38. W vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    4.5 / 2.8The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  39. W vs The Magician and the Fire
    4.1 / 3.9The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  40. W vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    4.8 / 2.5The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  41. W vs The Magician and the Fire
    4.5 / 3.5The Returning Readeranalysis →
  42. W vs The Magician and the Fire
    4.3 / 2.8The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  43. L vs Entre Rascunho e Apagar
    3.6 / 4.2The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  44. L vs Clipes
    3.8 / 4.3The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  45. W vs Clipes
    4.8 / 3.5The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  46. W vs O Verso Branquiceleste
    4.5 / 4.3The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  47. L vs O Sonhador e o Fogo
    3.3 / 4.3The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  48. W vs O Sonhador e o Fogo
    4.3 / 3.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  49. L vs Paperclip Rhapsody
    2.5 / 3.8The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  50. W vs Paperclip Rhapsody
    3.8 / 3.5The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  51. W vs Will AI Discover a New Conservation Law Before 2050?
    4.5 / 3.3The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  52. W vs Will AI Discover a New Conservation Law Before 2050?
    4.8 / 3.5The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  53. L vs Will AI Discover a New Conservation Law Before 2050?
    3.8 / 4.3The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  54. L vs Will AI Discover a New Conservation Law Before 2050?
    3.5 / 4.3The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  55. L vs The First Change
    3.3 / 4.5The Returning Readeranalysis →
  56. L vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    3.3 / 4.8The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  57. L vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    1.7 / 2.8The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →