Franklin Baldo

The Future Father: building a transmedia novel with AI agents

Read post →

What is this?

This page is an artifact of Hrönir: a pairwise-duel system for this blog's posts, judged by human and AI readers under different perspectives and ranked with OpenSkill. One battle, perspective, or version doesn't tell the whole story on its own.

See how it works and the full ranking →

global rank
#53
rank change
+2
win rate
47%
wins / duels
28/60
ordinal
8.672
Win rate over time (each point = one duel, chronological)

Perspective rankings

Duel history (60 total)

  1. L vs Entre Rascunho e Apagar
    2.5 / 3.8The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  2. L vs Entre Rascunho e Apagar
    2.9 / 3.9The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  3. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    2.8 / 4.3The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  4. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    4.0 / 4.5The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  5. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    3.5 / 4.3The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  6. L vs O Medo do Louco
    3.8 / 4.3The Returning Readeranalysis →
  7. W vs O Medo do Louco
    3.9 / 3.0The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  8. L vs The Price of Saudade
    3.3 / 3.8The Fact-Checkeranalysis →
  9. W vs O Aleph
    3.5 / 3.3The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  10. W vs Chegue, irmão, chegue irmã.
    4.5 / 4.0The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  11. L vs The Crease-Free Fold Exists
    3.3 / 4.5The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  12. L vs The Ruliad Is Laughing
    3.8 / 4.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  13. W vs Nonada
    4.8 / 2.5The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  14. L vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    3.3 / 4.5The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  15. W vs The Flute
    3.8 / 3.5The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  16. W vs Reality Maintenance (Moving Window XII)
    4.2 / 3.8The Fact-Checkeranalysis →
  17. W vs Espelhos
    4.5 / 4.0The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  18. L vs O Medo do Louco
    3.3 / 4.8The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  19. W vs Clipes
    4.5 / 3.8The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  20. W vs The Ruliad Is Laughing
    4.5 / 2.8The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  21. L vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    3.4 / 4.7The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  22. W vs O Tempo
    4.0 / 3.8The Returning Readeranalysis →
  23. L vs Prayer to the Unfinished (Moving Window V)
    2.8 / 4.8The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  24. L vs Patents For Social Vulnerabilities: A Modest Proposal For Turning Criminals Into Consultants
    4.0 / 4.3The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  25. W vs The Price of Saudade
    4.5 / 3.8The Meme Sommelieranalysis →
  26. W vs O Tempo
    4.8 / 4.3The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  27. L vs Fourteen Words
    3.0 / 3.8The Returning Readeranalysis →
  28. W vs Borges and I
    4.0 / 2.8The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  29. L vs Borges and I
    3.5 / 3.8The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  30. L vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    3.8 / 4.8The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  31. L vs Crossing After Interference
    3.0 / 4.0The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  32. W vs O Regral
    4.5 / 3.8The Fact-Checkeranalysis →
  33. L vs Reclaiming the Harness
    3.5 / 4.0The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  34. L vs Trinta de Abril
    3.7 / 3.9The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  35. W vs Trinta de Abril
    4.2 / 3.9The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  36. L vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    3.8 / 4.3The Fact-Checkeranalysis →
  37. L vs Are they really using a Reddit post to help bomb a submarine in Iran?
    3.8 / 4.4The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  38. W vs The Agent That Doesn't Invent Verbs
    4.3 / 2.5The Returning Readeranalysis →
  39. L vs Who the asterisk protects
    3.3 / 4.5The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  40. W vs Observer Error (Moving Window IV)
    3.8 / 2.7The Returning Readeranalysis →
  41. W vs Caminho
    4.0 / 2.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  42. W vs Escherian Sunrise (with Gödel)
    4.7 / 4.4The Craft Listeneranalysis →
  43. W vs Caminho
    3.9 / 3.8The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  44. L vs Caminho
    3.8 / 4.0The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  45. W vs Escherian Sunrise (with Gödel)
    4.8 / 2.5The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  46. W vs On Rigor in Science
    4.3 / 3.5The Applied Thinkeranalysis →
  47. W vs On Rigor in Science
    4.3 / 2.5The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  48. L vs On Rigor in Science
    3.0 / 4.3The Skeptical Specialistanalysis →
  49. W vs The Art of Delegation: Signatures and Sandboxes
    3.8 / 2.5The Lyric-as-Poem Readeranalysis →
  50. L vs Travessia: The Project that Writes Itself
    3.8 / 4.5The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  51. L vs Trinta de Abril
    3.3 / 4.8The Internet-Native Watcheranalysis →
  52. L vs Trinta de Abril
    3.8 / 4.3The Weird-Clarity Readeranalysis →
  53. W vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    3.8 / 3.0The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  54. L vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    3.3 / 3.8The Curious Outsideranalysis →
  55. L vs Pierre Menard, Computational Researcher
    3.5 / 4.4The Returning Readeranalysis →
  56. L vs Who the asterisk protects
    3.5 / 4.0The Lateral Essayistanalysis →
  57. W vs Who the asterisk protects
    4.1 / 4.0The Comedy-Carries-Argument Readeranalysis →
  58. L vs Rosencrantz Coin: Testing Whether LLMs Respect Probability
    3.5 / 3.8The Felt-Not-Explained Readeranalysis →
  59. W vs Crossing After Interference
    3.4 / 2.3The Long-form Rationalistanalysis →
  60. W vs Crossing After Interference
    4.0 / 2.8The Curious Outsideranalysis →